Had an Intel DG33TL based Windows 10 PC give us some problems earilier this week. After testing and swaping multiple things, turns out it might just be something on the mainboard. It was giving memory errors, but memory checked fine using MemTest 86+ in other systems. It would not wake up from sleep mode, Windows would just freeze, sometimes with artifacts on the screen. Replaced the system with another DG33TL, basically same specs just 2.93GHz processor instead of 3.00GHz. Office didn't have any documents or contacts to move over, just basically desktop PC used with in-house app and web surfing. Easy swap, like those :)
We had another DG33TL board so we replaced the board using same memory, Intel E8400 CPU, CPU fan, 8gb DDR2 memory, SATA drive, case and power supply. Only item different is the mainboard. MemTest86+ ran 26 hours with no problems, so booted up Windows and no issues so far. Sleep mode is working, had to re-active Windows but since it was digital license, simple click and it was done. Still in the burn in phase, but everything looks good.
Do not see any visible signs of issues with the other DG33TL board, was hoping for a bad cap but if there are any they don't look it. Might remove the caps and check them but probably not really worth the time. I think it has something to do with frequency. Slower FSB processors are not giving any memory errors. So far tried Intel Pentium E5400 and Intel Core 2 E4500, no issues. Have an Intel Core 2 E8600 we can try just need to pull it. Ahh the things we do when we have down time.
VersaCom, Inc.
VersaCom is privately owned and located in Greenwood, Indiana. We want to be your IT company
Friday, November 3, 2017
Been awhile since posting, sorry about that. Today, I was greeted by Windows Feature Update 1709. "Great." I tell myself, "Another Windows creator update.... what app will break today??? How many calls will I get???"
I'm still old school, so Classic Shell needed to 'configure' itself after the update, it did automatically, well I had to click 'ok' first. I see only one item that stands out, a strange person looking icon on the system tray... "hmm... what is this?" It is labeled 'people'
. Looks like you can pin "contacts for easy access" Is that another way of Microsoft spying on us? You can turn it off by right clicking on the system tray and placing check next to 'Show People Button'. Sounds good.
After downloading the update and clicking 'restart', the PC did the normal blue screen with the 'update' progress counter running, took a few moments to get to 100% -- typical major update stuff. After that I got the 'Hi' black screen.... yep, still typical creator update stuff, that took a bit longer. Didn't Microsoft just do the 1703 update? Guess time flies. After about 10 minutes, I'm guessing everything was up and running.
I don't notice any performance improvements. This PC is an old Acer Intel Pentium G2020 with 5gb DDR3 memory and traditional HDD SATA drive, not state of the art but still good.
The About screen looks a little different
Microsoft must not be pushing it out too hard, most of the PCs here still have not received it. Good, it's Friday, I don't want to work hard on a Friday! lol
Tuesday, November 1, 2016
Since I had a little time on my hands (that was sarcasm) I installed an old ATI Radeon X300 PCIe video card into an Windows 10 system. The ATI X300 was from MSI and it has DVI, svideo and VGA output. The mainboard was an Intel DG33BU, onboard graphics was working fine just didn't support the resolution I needed (1366 x 768) for the monitor (Westinghouse LCD TV 27").
First off, I know both the card and the monitor are old, but if they aren't broke then we don't need to replace 'em.... That being said, I didn't want to use a new Nvidia PCIe card and I have a few of these X300's collecting dust. Installed the card, of course Windows 10 didn't have a driver and the generic driver didn't show the correct resolution (which I knew before installing the card). Did a quick Google search for a driver and found lots of choices must of which didn't install properly or were for other newer models of video card. AMD's site didn't have anything that old that I could find anyway. Turns out ATI Catalyst 8.11 contains a driver for the X300 and works with Windows 10 (it is a Vista 64 app). Other newer versions of Catalyst might work as well, but 8.11 was the first one that worked for me so I'll just keep it for now. Later on, might try some other Catalyst versions. Multiple versions of Catalyst can be downloaded from descargas.hispazone.org/Programas/Catalyst.
Normally, I would not have installed the full Catalyst software and only installed the driver but the monitor has the picture moved over to the right too far. I used the Catalyst software to move the picture back to the left.
Bottom line, it works fine seems fast enough for desktop work and YouTube videos, happy camper.
First off, I know both the card and the monitor are old, but if they aren't broke then we don't need to replace 'em.... That being said, I didn't want to use a new Nvidia PCIe card and I have a few of these X300's collecting dust. Installed the card, of course Windows 10 didn't have a driver and the generic driver didn't show the correct resolution (which I knew before installing the card). Did a quick Google search for a driver and found lots of choices must of which didn't install properly or were for other newer models of video card. AMD's site didn't have anything that old that I could find anyway. Turns out ATI Catalyst 8.11 contains a driver for the X300 and works with Windows 10 (it is a Vista 64 app). Other newer versions of Catalyst might work as well, but 8.11 was the first one that worked for me so I'll just keep it for now. Later on, might try some other Catalyst versions. Multiple versions of Catalyst can be downloaded from descargas.hispazone.org/Programas/Catalyst.
Normally, I would not have installed the full Catalyst software and only installed the driver but the monitor has the picture moved over to the right too far. I used the Catalyst software to move the picture back to the left.
Bottom line, it works fine seems fast enough for desktop work and YouTube videos, happy camper.
Friday, June 3, 2016
Just installed Windows 10 Pro (x64) using 2gb of memory! Yes, that lame-o amount of memory worked fine. I did not say it worked well! Performance is very lacking after installing a few third party programs, especially AVG Internet Security suite and IOBit Advanced SystemCare. With only the operating system, 2gb of memory actually performed quiet quickly. I was impressed. The system was just an old D945GCCR mainboard with Intel E4500 processor. Disk drive was also old SATA-II Western Digital Blue 250GB.
All-in-All, this system could be used on a desktop for basic (very basic) use (word processing, spreadsheets, etc) but hooking up to Internet and being more productive.... needs more memory.

Friday, March 4, 2016
Just for the heck if it, I decided to upgrade an old Acer 3610 notebook to Windows 10. I know that is a waste of time, money and effort...right? Well we'll see. First off the Acer 3610 is a Intel Celeron M 370 32-bit. Weak performance by any stretch. Well that chipset is Intel 910GML which does support Pentium M's. Will try a Pentium M later on but for now, we'll keep our amazingly fast (scarcasm) 1.5GHz Celeron 400FSB processor. Disk drive was 40gb IDE so that had to go, replaced with SSD IDE (well probaby compact flash inside but interface is IDE none the less). That helped the disk performance bottleneck. Memory is limited to 2gb. Major bottleneck here but we'll deal with it. The system has 3gb installed (2gb SODIMM and 1gb SODIMM) but Windows can only access 2gb since the Intel 910GML chipset. Didn't have another 1gb stick so we'll waste 1gb of memory for the time being. Now for the fun part....
Still had a few Windows 8.1 keys from our MSDN membership, so installing that to get Windows 10 thru Windows Update. Installation was normal and surprisingly quick. All drivers were found except using basic Microsoft video driver. Time for ReadyBoost, need to milk everything we can to get some performance. I know that stinks too but better than nothing. Installed a Kingston 2gb USB drive for ReadyBoost. USB interface is only 2.0. Replaced the wireless card to a N mode card to milk that performance, but for now still using the wired 10/100 port. Windows update.... wow this famous for stinking with low memory or even medium amounts of memory. Mega memory hog, this will be painful. Yes, it was. a few hours later Windows 8.1 shows me the Windows 10 upgrade icon now. Let's do it.
Windows 10 downloaded and is installing as we speak (blog). "Configuring update for Windows 10. 15% complete" so far. Okay, maybe the processor upgrade should have been done first... Okay maybe this project should not have even started but I am curious. I will come in a few.
Just looked over at the notebook, we are to the black "Updating Windows" and "11% screen". Making progress, slowly but progress.
Well, Windows 10 install finished sometime over night. It does work but I wouldn't call it usable. It is in much need of more horsepower. Will try to determine which kind, CPU, memory or all of the above. My money is on the CPU is just too darn slow, don't see a lot of disk access so probably not paging. Task Manager says mega CPU usage on interrupts, guessing video driver since no 910GML driver for Windows 10. Only XPDM.
Don't think it is worth trying another processor without video support.
Just too old guess it's limit will be Windows 7.
Still had a few Windows 8.1 keys from our MSDN membership, so installing that to get Windows 10 thru Windows Update. Installation was normal and surprisingly quick. All drivers were found except using basic Microsoft video driver. Time for ReadyBoost, need to milk everything we can to get some performance. I know that stinks too but better than nothing. Installed a Kingston 2gb USB drive for ReadyBoost. USB interface is only 2.0. Replaced the wireless card to a N mode card to milk that performance, but for now still using the wired 10/100 port. Windows update.... wow this famous for stinking with low memory or even medium amounts of memory. Mega memory hog, this will be painful. Yes, it was. a few hours later Windows 8.1 shows me the Windows 10 upgrade icon now. Let's do it.
Windows 10 downloaded and is installing as we speak (blog). "Configuring update for Windows 10. 15% complete" so far. Okay, maybe the processor upgrade should have been done first... Okay maybe this project should not have even started but I am curious. I will come in a few.
Just looked over at the notebook, we are to the black "Updating Windows" and "11% screen". Making progress, slowly but progress.
Don't think it is worth trying another processor without video support.
Just too old guess it's limit will be Windows 7.
Tuesday, March 1, 2016
The Fedora server is still version 8 by name but that is just about where it stops. Being a geek, I update things using the source and build them myself... tweek here and there never hurts either :)
Monday, January 11, 2016
Here we go, removed the ATI card, do not see any physical damage but it has had a few caps replaced in the past, so maybe they are bad again or perhaps another issue... that is for later post. Installed the Nvidia card. Powered on and Microsoft did the normal default video driver and poor resolution. Went over to the Nvidia driver download site and put in my video card information and sure enough there is a Windows 8 x64 driver. Slightly surprised, I was guessing it would be Vista driver. Downloaded and Installed the Nvidia driver. Working perfectly. Windows is also working perfectly with all the normal video related pretty whistles and bells turned on. I am a happy camper.
This Nvidia card has....wait for it.... wait for it.... 64mb of video memory. I remember having discussions with my techs here at the shop where they would all say they needed mega memory for their video cards and they could see the performance difference using desktop apps. I always said they were mistaken but nobody would ever listen. This once again proves that I was right.... just sayin'. Of course if you need 1000 fps rate on your first person shooter then old video cards are not for you. Desktop applications do not need that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)